Diamonds are Forever

I wrote earlier about the need to appear differently to different people in the online world (to have different status messages and different availability for different groups of people). Having this all in mind I think there is a need to look at the notion of online presence as a faceted phenomenon. For this reason I present the notion of presence diamond to capture the faceted nature of presence and the need to appear differently to different groups of people.

presence-diamond

The notion of presence diamond allows us to look at a person’s online presence as a diamond whereas different observers are introduced to different facets of the diamond. Facets differ among themselves in :

  • Different types of presence data that is accessible by observers of a facet (like in cases where a user specifies a group of people who cannot see his location/or his status message regardless of the location/message);
  • Different granularity of information accessible (like giving exact location to friends and only country or city information to strangers);
  • Different data that is emitted to different observers (like having totally different status messages and different availability for different groups of contacts).

I believe this notion can help understand and study the faceted nature of presence and identity in general.


Acknowledgement

The figure and the notion of the Presence Diamond are strongly inspired by the notion of the diamond of digital identity, that Mike Roch,  from University of Reading, introduced at the Eduserv Digital Identity Workshop in London, January 08, 2009

Update

The presence diamond is published in a peer-reviewed publication. In can be cited as:

Stankovic, M., Passant, A. and Laublet, P., Directing Status Messages to their Audiences in Online Communities. Published in Pre-proceedings of Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms Workshop (COIN @ MELLOW) 7th–11th September, 2009, Torino, Italy

2 Comments to "Diamonds are Forever"

  1. Scott Wilson wrote:

    I wrote a book chapter on presence some time back – but did not tackle the policy and observers aspect. I wonder though if the ontology I produced for that paper would be useful (thinking esp. of the W3 TF)

    More info here: http://zope.cetis.ac.uk/members/scott/blogview?entry=20090422185040

    The ontology part is towards the end of the slides.

    Cheers,

    S

  2. MilStan wrote:

    The table on the slide 25 is certainly interesting and, I think, a valuable overview for the TF.

Leave Your Comment

Connect with Facebook

 
Powered by Wordpress. Design by Bingo - The Web Design Experts.